Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Linkedin button
Delicious button
Digg button
Stumbleupon button

Considering Automated Content Sharing? Think Again!

Automated content sharingContent is one of the most important components of your digital marketing strategy. You’ve likely heard the expression “Content is king” – after all, if you’re not creating copy that people want to read, they have little motivation to visit your website, blog or fan page.

After you’ve created a batch of compelling content (or curated a group of links you’re eager to share), the next logical step is to distribute the material. To save time in what’s undoubtedly a hectic schedule, you might opt for an automated content sharing option.

Maybe you schedule a slew of tweets, or set up an automatic publishing feature through your blog or Facebook page. That way, you can ensure that you’re sharing not only your own content, but other sources, too, and maintain your distribution schedule even during the busiest of days.

Yet before you succumb to the convenience of automation, think twice. Continually sharing automated content may actually do more harm than good, according to Eric Wittlake’s post on B2B Digital Marketing.

Common side effects of content automation include:

  • An overemphasis on source selection as opposed to the actual content.
  • Over-sharing, which may result in publishing so much content that people can’t keep up with your stream.
  • Disconnection from your sources.
  • A lack of commenting or context that gives your readers additional motivation to read what you’ve shared.

Once your content curation becomes less thoughtful and more robotic, readers have less of an incentive to connect with you by reading what you’ve shared. Sure, content distribution can take some time, especially if you’ve shared something that generates a high level of conversation. But isn’t that what social media is all about? It is, after all, social—and automation is not.

Think of automated content sharing as a larger-scale replica of Twitter’s automated RT function, or the “new” RT style. When you hit that button, you share a tweet but are unable to add any of your own comments before publishing. Someone who already sees you as a trusted and valuable content source may have no qualms about clicking on your links, but without adding a personal touch to your message, you’re giving little incentive to prospective connections—and therefore diluting the overall purpose of your sharing strategy.

That being said, we don’t necessarily advocate that you ban all forms of automation from any of your online platforms. Maybe your blog posts are automatically fed to Facebook, or you schedule a handful of tweets to keep your stream active during a busy period or when you’re off the grid. Here’s the key goal to keep in mind: whatever you do, just don’t take the “you” out of what you’re sharing.

Our two cents? Take the time to curate, share and comment on your content. We know as well as anyone else that these actions take time away from other tasks. Yet in the pursuit of building a personable, engaged brand, time spent distributing content is as valuable as the time spent on other components of your digital strategy.

What are your thoughts regarding content sharing automation? Does the convenience factor win you over, or do you prefer to channel your efforts into hand-picking what’s shared to your audience?

Buffer
  • Anonymous

    This is a great perspective. I like how you didn’t make it an “either/or”.
    Auretha Callison
    http://www.FunFashionFairy.blogspot.com

  • http://www.facebook.com/TheWebsiteWordsmith Alexa Steele

    I agree wholeheartedly with this article. I have experimented with more automation, with poor results. Personalizing tweets and updates takes time and energy, but has better results.

  • http://twitter.com/KatyWrites Katy Schamberger

    Thanks so much, Auretha. Digital marketing and social media techniques are rarely black and white, so I’m glad you agreed with my refusal to avoid absolutes. Glad you enjoyed the post!

  • http://twitter.com/KatyWrites Katy Schamberger

    Great comment, Alexa! And I love that you can speak from personal experience. It’s true – avoiding automation certainly takes more time. But as you’ve seen, it produces much more effective results, making your investment worthwhile. Thanks for reading!!

  • http://twitter.com/katgordon Katherine M. Gordon

    Agreed. And apparently Facebook agrees, too. Their EdgeRank gives weight to updates that originate from within the Facebook platform and use entire links (not abbreviated links) to any content you post. Makes sense: an updated created “by hand” is perceived as more valuable as one automated from elsewhere.

  • Anonymous

    Very good, Kat! And so true. Yup – it’s harding being “present” but at the end of it all, it sure seems to pay off. At least it has for me. And clearly, for you, too!

    *
    *

  • http://philgerbyshak.com Phil Gerbyshak

    Awesome tips as usual Shelly. Taking more time instead of less time means you care more than someone who just automates everything, especially other’s stuff.

  • http://philgerbyshak.com Phil Gerbyshak

    They’re penalizing shortened links too? Not sure I like that much as sometimes links are just so dang ugly.

    Good to know though! Thank you!!

  • Anonymous

    I agree. And I don’t really understand the concept behind penalizing them, Phil.

  • Anonymous

    Thanks Phil. A little automation, imho, is fine. A bunch says, at least to me, “I’m too lazy to deal with this personally, where’s the EASY BUTTON.” And I don’t care for that. Thanks for coming by!

  • Anonymous

    And it should be perceived more valuable … at least to my way of thinking (and I know yours, too!) … because it is. Someone who takes the time to update “by hand” is sharing content as it’s intended to be shared. The automators …. they are looking for lots of impact, little engagement. They’ll get theirs :) )

  • http://twitter.com/Jason__Ramsey Jason Ramsey

    Great piece.

  • Anonymous

    Invaluable insight here, Shelly – thanks for sharing. I believe that we’ve moved on from “Content is King” – there’s so much content whizzing around our various streams of consciousness in a hyper connected world that it’s becoming increasingly challenging in a time poor world to sort through what’s relevant and useful to them. 

    I truly believe that we’re now in an environment where “CONTEXT” is king. People will increasingly find ways of filtering information based not only on areas of interest (what), but through trusted sources (who), timeliness of the information (when) and the practicality of applying the content to their situation (how).

    If automation can develop the smarts to address all or some of these factors, it will become a vital tool in a more contextual world.     

  • Anonymous

    Invaluable insight here, Shelly – thanks for sharing. I believe that we’ve moved on from “Content is King”. There’s so much content whizzing around our various online streams of consciousness in a hyper connected world that it’s becoming increasingly challenging and overwhelming in a time poor world to sort through what’s relevant and useful. 

    I truly believe that we’re now in an environment where “CONTEXT” is king. People will increasingly find ways of filtering information based not only on areas of interest (what), but through trusted sources (who), timeliness of the information (when) and the practicality of applying the content to their situation (how). I’m talking a version of RSS that’s customised for personal, situational and other predictive factors.

    If automation can develop the smarts to address all or some of these factors, it will become a vital tool in a more contextual world.

    Cheers, Iggy

  • Pingback: Maximizing StumbleUpon For Your Content Sharing Strategy | V3 Kansas City Integrated Marketing and Social Media Agency

  • Pingback: Maximising StumbleUpon For Your Content Sharing Strategy

  • Pingback: Maximizing StumbleUpon For Your Content Sharing Strategy Peg Fitzpatrick

You can also find me on Google+ Real Time Web Analytics